1994 Najad 343 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

1994 Najad 343
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Najad 3432013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerNajadBeneteau
Year1994–20042013
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenFrance
DesignerJudel/VrolijkVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL8.69 m (28.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,400 kg (11,905 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast2,200 kg (4,850 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.5 m² (511 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths62
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Najad 343
15.68
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Najad 343
40.74
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Najad 343
0.74
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Najad 343
20.44
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Najad 343 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Najad 343 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1994 Najad 343 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 1994 Najad 343 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1994 Najad 343 is 0.26m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 1994 Najad 343 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Najad 343 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.68 and 47.5 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Najad 343 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1994 Najad 343 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Najad 343 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Najad 343 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1994 Najad 343 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Najad 343 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3