1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 vs Hunter 280 — Comparison

1995 Beneteau Oceanis 3211995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
VS
Hunter 280Hunter 280

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321Hunter 280
General
ManufacturerBeneteauHunter
Year1995–20011998–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe FinotGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.68 m (31.8 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL8.45 m (27.7 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam3.27 m (10.7 ft)2.82 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)998 kg (2,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.37
Hunter 280
18.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
35.71
Hunter 280
38.61
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
0.81
Hunter 280
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.12
Hunter 280
16.46

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and Hunter 280 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the Hunter 280 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 was penned by Groupe Finot. The Hunter 280 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 measures 9.68m (31.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.27m, compared to the Hunter 280 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.82m beam. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is 1.15m longer than the Hunter 280. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 displaces approximately 62% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 280, with an SA/D of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The Hunter 280 has a comfort ratio of 16.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 35.7% for the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 38.6% for the Hunter 280, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 280 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 · Hunter 280