Catalina 34 MkII vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison

Catalina 34 MkII
VS
1992 Moody 411992 Moody 41

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 34 MkII1992 Moody 41
General
ManufacturerCatalinaMoody
Year1995–20041992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGerry DouglasBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.86 m (12.7 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)70.0 m² (754 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)360 L (95.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 34 MkII
17.08
1992 Moody 41
15.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 34 MkII
37.50
1992 Moody 41
38.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 34 MkII
0.77
1992 Moody 41
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 34 MkII
18.13
1992 Moody 41
20.58

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 34 MkII and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 34 MkII is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The Catalina 34 MkII was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the Catalina 34 MkII measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 2.14m longer than the Catalina 34 MkII. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 34 MkII has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.08 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 34 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 34 MkII offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the Catalina 34 MkII and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 34 MkII provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 34 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1992 Moody 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 34 MkII · 1992 Moody 41