1995 Feeling 39 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1995 Feeling 39
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Feeling 391976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerFeelingC&C Yachts
Year1995–20031976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceCanada
DesignerPhilippe HarléCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA11.80 m (38.7 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.78 m (12.4 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.0 m² (710 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Feeling 39
18.21
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Feeling 39 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s design by Feeling from France, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1995 Feeling 39 was penned by Philippe Harlé. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1995 Feeling 39 measures 11.80m (38.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.78m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 1.74m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 72% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Feeling 39 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Feeling 39 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Feeling 39 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1995 Feeling 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Feeling 39 · 1976 C&C 33