Catalina 387 vs 1984 Ericson 38 — Comparison

Catalina 387Catalina 387
VS
1984 Ericson 381984 Ericson 38

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3871984 Ericson 38
General
ManufacturerCatalinaEricson
Year1996–20031984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasBruce King / Ron Holland
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.66 m (12.0 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.96 m (6.4 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area63.0 m² (678 ft²)60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 387
16.73
1984 Ericson 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 387
39.39
1984 Ericson 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 387
0.75
1984 Ericson 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 387
18.47
1984 Ericson 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 387 and 1984 Ericson 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 387 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1984 Ericson 38 is a 1980s offering from Ericson from USA. The Catalina 387 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1984 Ericson 38 was designed by Bruce King / Ron Holland.

In terms of size, the Catalina 387 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.66m, compared to the 1984 Ericson 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 387 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.73 and 63.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Ericson 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 387 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 387 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 Ericson 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 39.4% for the Catalina 387 and 42.4% for the 1984 Ericson 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 387 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1984 Ericson 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Ericson 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 387 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 387 · 1984 Ericson 38