1996 Contest 48CS vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison

1996 Contest 48CS 1996 Contest 48CS
VS
1996 Moody 45 1996 Moody 45

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1996 Contest 48CS 1996 Moody 45
General
Manufacturer Contest Moody
Year 1996–2005 1996–2002
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Netherlands UK
Designer Dick Zaal Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 14.63 m (48.0 ft) 13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL 11.89 m (39.0 ft) 11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam 4.24 m (13.9 ft) 4.22 m (13.8 ft)
Draft 2.20 m (7.2 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 14,969 kg (33,001 lbs) 12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
Ballast 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) 4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 98.0 m² (1,055 ft²) 85.0 m² (915 ft²)
Hull Material Steel Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 100 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 400 L (105.7 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity 600 L (158.5 gal) 450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 8
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Contest 48CS
16.39
1996 Moody 45
16.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Contest 48CS
39.39
1996 Moody 45
39.20
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Contest 48CS
0.69
1996 Moody 45
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Contest 48CS
20.78
1996 Moody 45
19.06

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Contest 48CS and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Contest 48CS is a 1990s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 1996 Contest 48CS was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1996 Contest 48CS measures 14.63m (48.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.24m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 1996 Contest 48CS is 0.91m longer than the 1996 Moody 45. The 1996 Contest 48CS displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Contest 48CS has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 98.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Contest 48CS has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Contest 48CS offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 39.4% for the 1996 Contest 48CS and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Contest 48CS provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 600L of water capacity and 400L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Contest 48CS is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Contest 48CS has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS