2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison

2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
VS
1996 Moody 45 1996 Moody 45

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 1996 Moody 45
General
Manufacturer Beneteau Moody
Year 2010–2014 1996–2002
Type Sloop Sloop
Country France UK
Designer Groupe Finot-Conq Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 13.17 m (43.2 ft) 13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL 11.60 m (38.1 ft) 11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam 4.17 m (13.7 ft) 4.22 m (13.8 ft)
Draft 2.10 m (6.9 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,500 kg (20,944 lbs) 12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
Ballast 3,000 kg (6,614 lbs) 4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 80.0 m² (861 ft²) 85.0 m² (915 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 54 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity 300 L (79.3 gal) 450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 8
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
18.12
1996 Moody 45
16.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
31.58
1996 Moody 45
39.20
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
0.79
1996 Moody 45
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43
14.95
1996 Moody 45
19.06

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 is a modern design by Beneteau from France, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 was penned by Groupe Finot-Conq. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 measures 13.17m (43.2ft) overall with a beam of 4.17m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 1996 Moody 45 is 0.55m longer than the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43. The 1996 Moody 45 displaces approximately 32% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.12 and 80.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 31.6% for the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Moody 45 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Beneteau Oceanis 43 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS