Hunter 36 vs 1985 Sabre 32 — Comparison

Hunter 36Hunter 36
VS
1985 Sabre 321985 Sabre 32

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 361985 Sabre 32
General
ManufacturerHunterSabre
Year1996–20011985–1991
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.45 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Ballast2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area56.0 m² (603 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine27 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 36
17.43
1985 Sabre 32
16.71
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 36
39.22
1985 Sabre 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 36
0.79
1985 Sabre 32
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 36
17.17
1985 Sabre 32
18.88

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 36 and 1985 Sabre 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 36 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1985 Sabre 32 is a 1980s offering from Sabre from USA. The Hunter 36 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1985 Sabre 32 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the Hunter 36 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 1985 Sabre 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The Hunter 36 is 1.07m longer than the 1985 Sabre 32. The Hunter 36 displaces approximately 44% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 36 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of sail area. The 1985 Sabre 32, with an SA/D of 16.71 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1985 Sabre 32 has a comfort ratio of 18.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Hunter 36 and 40.0% for the 1985 Sabre 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1985 Sabre 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Sabre 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 36 · 1985 Sabre 32