Hunter 36 vs 2001 Tartan 4100 — Comparison
Hunter 36
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 36 | 2001 Tartan 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Tartan |
| Year | 1996–2001 | 2001–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Tim Jackett |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.56 m (11.7 ft) | 3.96 m (13.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 2.13 m (7.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) | 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs) | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 56.0 m² (603 ft²) | 75.0 m² (807 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 27 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 95 L (25.1 gal) | 170 L (44.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 170 L (44.9 gal) | 340 L (89.8 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 36 and 2001 Tartan 4100 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 36 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2001 Tartan 4100 is a 2000s offering from Tartan from USA. The Hunter 36 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2001 Tartan 4100 was designed by Tim Jackett.
In terms of size, the Hunter 36 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 2001 Tartan 4100 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.96m beam. The 2001 Tartan 4100 is 1.68m longer than the Hunter 36. The 2001 Tartan 4100 displaces approximately 62% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 36 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of sail area. The 2001 Tartan 4100, with an SA/D of 16.96 and 75.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2001 Tartan 4100 has a comfort ratio of 18.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Hunter 36 and 40.5% for the 2001 Tartan 4100, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 2001 Tartan 4100 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 340L water and 170L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2001 Tartan 4100 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2001 Tartan 4100 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 36 · 2001 Tartan 4100