Hunter 36 vs 2002 Najad 440 — Comparison

Hunter 36Hunter 36
VS
2002 Najad 440

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 362002 Najad 440
General
ManufacturerHunterNajad
Year1996–20012002–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerGlenn HendersonJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)13.50 m (44.3 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)11.20 m (36.7 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)4.10 m (13.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)11,500 kg (25,353 lbs)
Ballast2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area56.0 m² (603 ft²)88.0 m² (947 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine27 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)280 L (74.0 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)480 L (126.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 36
17.43
2002 Najad 440
17.55
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 36
39.22
2002 Najad 440
39.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 36
0.79
2002 Najad 440
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 36
17.17
2002 Najad 440
19.08

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 36 and 2002 Najad 440 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 36 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2002 Najad 440 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Hunter 36 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2002 Najad 440 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the Hunter 36 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 2002 Najad 440 at 13.50m (44.3ft) with a 4.10m beam. The 2002 Najad 440 is 2.68m longer than the Hunter 36. The 2002 Najad 440 displaces approximately 95% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 36 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of sail area. The 2002 Najad 440, with an SA/D of 17.55 and 88.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2002 Najad 440 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2002 Najad 440 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Hunter 36 and 39.1% for the 2002 Najad 440, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 2002 Najad 440 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 480L water and 280L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2002 Najad 440 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2002 Najad 440 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2002 Najad 440 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 36 · 2002 Najad 440