Hunter 36 vs 2006 Tartan 4400 — Comparison

Hunter 36 Hunter 36
VS
2006 Tartan 4400 2006 Tartan 4400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hunter 36 2006 Tartan 4400
General
Manufacturer Hunter Tartan
Year 1996–2001 2006–2014
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Glenn Henderson Tim Jackett
Dimensions
LOA 10.82 m (35.5 ft) 13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 11.58 m (38.0 ft)
Beam 3.56 m (11.7 ft) 4.11 m (13.5 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 2.23 m (7.3 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) 11,340 kg (25,000 lbs)
Ballast 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 56.0 m² (603 ft²) 88.0 m² (947 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 27 HP 75 HP
Fuel Capacity 95 L (25.1 gal) 230 L (60.8 gal)
Water Capacity 170 L (44.9 gal) 416 L (109.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 8
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 36
17.43
2006 Tartan 4400
17.71
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 36
39.22
2006 Tartan 4400
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 36
0.79
2006 Tartan 4400
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 36
17.17
2006 Tartan 4400
18.02

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 36 and 2006 Tartan 4400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 36 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2006 Tartan 4400 is a 2000s offering from Tartan from USA. The Hunter 36 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2006 Tartan 4400 was designed by Tim Jackett.

In terms of size, the Hunter 36 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 2006 Tartan 4400 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.11m beam. The 2006 Tartan 4400 is 2.59m longer than the Hunter 36. The 2006 Tartan 4400 displaces approximately 92% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 36 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of sail area. The 2006 Tartan 4400, with an SA/D of 17.71 and 88.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2006 Tartan 4400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2006 Tartan 4400 has a comfort ratio of 18.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Hunter 36 and 40.0% for the 2006 Tartan 4400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 2006 Tartan 4400 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 416L water and 230L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2006 Tartan 4400 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2006 Tartan 4400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2006 Tartan 4400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS