1996 Moody 45 vs 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 — Comparison

1996 Moody 45 1996 Moody 45
VS
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1996 Moody 45 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45
General
Manufacturer Moody Beneteau
Year 1996–2002 2012–2017
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK France
Designer Bill Dixon Finot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA 13.72 m (45.0 ft) 13.94 m (45.7 ft)
LWL 11.50 m (37.7 ft) 12.50 m (41.0 ft)
Beam 4.22 m (13.8 ft) 4.49 m (14.7 ft)
Draft 1.80 m (5.9 ft) 2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 12,500 kg (27,558 lbs) 10,100 kg (22,267 lbs)
Ballast 4,900 kg (10,803 lbs) 3,100 kg (6,834 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 85.0 m² (915 ft²) 88.0 m² (947 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 250 L (66.0 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Water Capacity 450 L (118.9 gal) 330 L (87.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 8
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Moody 45
16.03
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45
19.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Moody 45
39.20
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45
30.69
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Moody 45
0.73
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Moody 45
19.06
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45
12.55

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Moody 45 and 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1996 Moody 45 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 1996 Moody 45 measures 13.72m (45.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.22m, compared to the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 at 13.94m (45.7ft) with a 4.49m beam. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 is 0.22m longer than the 1996 Moody 45. The 1996 Moody 45 displaces approximately 24% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Moody 45 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of sail area. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45, with an SA/D of 19.13 and 88.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Moody 45 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 has a comfort ratio of 12.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45 and 30.7% for the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Moody 45 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 330L water and 180L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Moody 45 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS