1996 Najad 380 vs 1986 Westerly Oceanlord — Comparison

1996 Najad 380 1996 Najad 380
VS
1986 Westerly Oceanlord 1986 Westerly Oceanlord

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1996 Najad 380 1986 Westerly Oceanlord
General
Manufacturer Najad Westerly
Year 1996–2006 1986–1992
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Sweden UK
Designer Judel/Vrolijk Ed Dubois
Dimensions
LOA 11.55 m (37.9 ft) 12.04 m (39.5 ft)
LWL 9.50 m (31.2 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam 3.55 m (11.6 ft) 3.81 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 1.85 m (6.1 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) 9,980 kg (22,002 lbs)
Ballast 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 62.0 m² (667 ft²) 68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 50 HP
Fuel Capacity 150 L (39.6 gal) 182 L (48.1 gal)
Water Capacity 260 L (68.7 gal) 340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Najad 380
16.44
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Najad 380
40.67
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
36.36
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Najad 380
0.73
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Najad 380
20.83
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
23.70

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Najad 380 and 1986 Westerly Oceanlord represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1996 Najad 380 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1996 Najad 380 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord at 12.04m (39.5ft) with a 3.81m beam. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord is 0.49m longer than the 1996 Najad 380. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Najad 380 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Najad 380 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380 and 36.4% for the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Najad 380 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 340L water and 182L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS