1996 Najad 380 vs 1987 C&C 44 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1996 Najad 380 | 1987 C&C 44 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Najad | C&C Yachts |
| Year | 1996–2006 | 1987–1993 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | Canada |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | Cuthbertson & Cassian |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.55 m (37.9 ft) | 13.41 m (44.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.50 m (31.2 ft) | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.55 m (11.6 ft) | 3.96 m (13.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) | 2.00 m (6.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) | 10,433 kg (23,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) | 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 62.0 m² (667 ft²) | 80.0 m² (861 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 45 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 170 L (44.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 260 L (68.7 gal) | 300 L (79.3 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1996 Najad 380 and 1987 C&C 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1987 C&C 44 is a 1980s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1996 Najad 380 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1987 C&C 44 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.
In terms of size, the 1996 Najad 380 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1987 C&C 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 3.96m beam. The 1987 C&C 44 is 1.86m longer than the 1996 Najad 380. The 1987 C&C 44 displaces approximately 39% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1996 Najad 380 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1987 C&C 44, with an SA/D of 17.02 and 80.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1987 C&C 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1996 Najad 380 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1987 C&C 44 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380 and 41.3% for the 1987 C&C 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1996 Najad 380 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1987 C&C 44 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 300L water and 170L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1987 C&C 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1987 C&C 44 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1996 Najad 380 · 1987 C&C 44