2004 Hunter 466 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison

2004 Hunter 4662004 Hunter 466
VS
1996 Najad 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2004 Hunter 4661996 Najad 380
General
ManufacturerHunterNajad
Year2004–20081996–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerGlenn HendersonJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA14.17 m (46.5 ft)11.55 m (37.9 ft)
LWL12.50 m (41.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
Beam4.37 m (14.3 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement12,247 kg (27,000 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area90.5 m² (974 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity379 L (100.1 gal)260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2004 Hunter 466
17.30
1996 Najad 380
16.44
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2004 Hunter 466
33.33
1996 Najad 380
40.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2004 Hunter 466
0.76
1996 Najad 380
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2004 Hunter 466
15.61
1996 Najad 380
20.83

Detailed Comparison

The 2004 Hunter 466 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Hunter 466 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 2004 Hunter 466 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 2004 Hunter 466 measures 14.17m (46.5ft) overall with a beam of 4.37m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 2004 Hunter 466 is 2.62m longer than the 1996 Najad 380. The 2004 Hunter 466 displaces approximately 63% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2004 Hunter 466 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.30 and 90.5 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2004 Hunter 466 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2004 Hunter 466 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 33.3% for the 2004 Hunter 466 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2004 Hunter 466 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2004 Hunter 466 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2004 Hunter 466 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2004 Hunter 466 · 1996 Najad 380