1996 Najad 380 vs 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 — Comparison

1996 Najad 380
VS
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1996 Najad 3802012 Beneteau Oceanis 45
General
ManufacturerNajadBeneteau
Year1996–20062012–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenFrance
DesignerJudel/VrolijkFinot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA11.55 m (37.9 ft)13.94 m (45.7 ft)
LWL9.50 m (31.2 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
Beam3.55 m (11.6 ft)4.49 m (14.7 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)10,100 kg (22,267 lbs)
Ballast3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)3,100 kg (6,834 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.0 m² (667 ft²)88.0 m² (947 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Water Capacity260 L (68.7 gal)330 L (87.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1996 Najad 380
16.44
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45
19.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1996 Najad 380
40.67
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45
30.69
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1996 Najad 380
0.73
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1996 Najad 380
20.83
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45
12.55

Detailed Comparison

The 1996 Najad 380 and 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1996 Najad 380 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 1996 Najad 380 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 at 13.94m (45.7ft) with a 4.49m beam. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 is 2.39m longer than the 1996 Najad 380. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1996 Najad 380 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45, with an SA/D of 19.13 and 88.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1996 Najad 380 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 has a comfort ratio of 12.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380 and 30.7% for the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1996 Najad 380 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 330L water and 180L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1996 Najad 380 · 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 45