Catalina 390 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

Catalina 390
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3901976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerCatalinaC&C Yachts
Year1997–20031976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSACanada
DesignerGerry DouglasCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA11.89 m (39.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,256 kg (18,201 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area65.5 m² (705 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity265 L (70.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 390
16.29
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 390
39.56
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 390
0.75
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 390
18.93
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 390 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 390 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The Catalina 390 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the Catalina 390 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Catalina 390 is 1.83m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The Catalina 390 displaces approximately 82% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 390 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.5 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 390 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 390 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 39.6% for the Catalina 390 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 390 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 265L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 390 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 390 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 390 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 390 · 1976 C&C 33