1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
1992 Moody 41
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 | 1992 Moody 41 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hallberg-Rassy | Moody |
| Year | 1997–2007 | 1992–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | UK |
| Designer | German Frers | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.35 m (34.0 ft) | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.85 m (29.0 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.34 m (11.0 ft) | 3.86 m (12.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) | 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs) | 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 53.0 m² (571 ft²) | 70.0 m² (754 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 28 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 120 L (31.7 gal) | 180 L (47.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 200 L (52.8 gal) | 360 L (95.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was penned by German Frers. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 measures 10.35m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.34m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 2.15m longer than the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 69% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1992 Moody 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 · 1992 Moody 41