1997 Moody 38 vs Catalina 36 MkII — Comparison

1997 Moody 38 1997 Moody 38
VS
Catalina 36 MkII Catalina 36 MkII

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1997 Moody 38 Catalina 36 MkII
General
Manufacturer Moody Catalina
Year 1997–2003 1999–2006
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK USA
Designer Bill Dixon Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 11.58 m (38.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 9.60 m (31.5 ft) 9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam 3.72 m (12.2 ft) 3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) 6,577 kg (14,500 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 59.8 m² (644 ft²) 56.5 m² (608 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Bilge Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 27 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity 227 L (60.0 gal) 189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Moody 38
14.98
Catalina 36 MkII
16.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Moody 38
38.89
Catalina 36 MkII
37.94
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Moody 38
0.74
Catalina 36 MkII
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Moody 38
20.98
Catalina 36 MkII
18.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Moody 38 and Catalina 36 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the Catalina 36 MkII is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The Catalina 36 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Catalina 36 MkII at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1997 Moody 38 is 0.61m longer than the Catalina 36 MkII. The 1997 Moody 38 displaces approximately 24% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The Catalina 36 MkII, with an SA/D of 16.35 and 56.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 36 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Catalina 36 MkII has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 37.9% for the Catalina 36 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Catalina 36 MkII offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 36 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS