1997 Moody 38 vs Hunter 450 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1997 Moody 38 | Hunter 450 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Moody | Hunter |
| Year | 1997–2003 | 2001–2006 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | UK | USA |
| Designer | Bill Dixon | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) | 13.72 m (45.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.60 m (31.5 ft) | 11.89 m (39.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.72 m (12.2 ft) | 4.27 m (14.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 2.06 m (6.8 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) | 10,886 kg (23,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 59.8 m² (644 ft²) | 86.0 m² (926 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Bilge | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 35 HP | 75 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 227 L (60.0 gal) | 341 L (90.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 8 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1997 Moody 38 and Hunter 450 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the Hunter 450 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The Hunter 450 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Hunter 450 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.27m beam. The Hunter 450 is 2.14m longer than the 1997 Moody 38. The Hunter 450 displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The Hunter 450, with an SA/D of 17.79 and 86.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 450 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Hunter 450 has a comfort ratio of 15.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 37.5% for the Hunter 450, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hunter 450 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 341L water and 189L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 450 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hunter 450 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1997 Moody 38 · Hunter 450