1997 Moody 38 vs 2002 X-Yachts X-37 — Comparison

1997 Moody 38 1997 Moody 38
VS
2002 X-Yachts X-37 2002 X-Yachts X-37

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1997 Moody 38 2002 X-Yachts X-37
General
Manufacturer Moody X-Yachts
Year 1997–2003 2002–2008
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK Denmark
Designer Bill Dixon Niels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA 11.58 m (38.0 ft) 11.15 m (36.6 ft)
LWL 9.60 m (31.5 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam 3.72 m (12.2 ft) 3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) 6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 59.8 m² (644 ft²) 62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Bilge Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 227 L (60.0 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Moody 38
14.98
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Moody 38
38.89
2002 X-Yachts X-37
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Moody 38
0.74
2002 X-Yachts X-37
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Moody 38
20.98
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.77

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Moody 38 and 2002 X-Yachts X-37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is a 2000s offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 at 11.15m (36.6ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 1997 Moody 38 is 0.43m longer than the 2002 X-Yachts X-37. The 1997 Moody 38 displaces approximately 26% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37, with an SA/D of 18.09 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 38.5% for the 2002 X-Yachts X-37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1997 Moody 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS