1975 Pearson 39 vs 2002 X-Yachts X-37 — Comparison

1975 Pearson 39 1975 Pearson 39
VS
2002 X-Yachts X-37 2002 X-Yachts X-37

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1975 Pearson 39 2002 X-Yachts X-37
General
Manufacturer Pearson X-Yachts
Year 1975–1980 2002–2008
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Denmark
Designer William Shaw Niels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA 11.89 m (39.0 ft) 11.15 m (36.6 ft)
LWL 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,711 kg (17,000 lbs) 6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 60.8 m² (654 ft²) 62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 Pearson 39
15.83
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 Pearson 39
41.17
2002 X-Yachts X-37
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 Pearson 39
0.71
2002 X-Yachts X-37
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 Pearson 39
21.46
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.77

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 Pearson 39 and 2002 X-Yachts X-37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 Pearson 39 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is a 2000s offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1975 Pearson 39 was penned by William Shaw. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1975 Pearson 39 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 at 11.15m (36.6ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 1975 Pearson 39 is 0.74m longer than the 2002 X-Yachts X-37. The 1975 Pearson 39 displaces approximately 19% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 Pearson 39 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 60.8 m² of sail area. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37, with an SA/D of 18.09 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 Pearson 39 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1975 Pearson 39 and 38.5% for the 2002 X-Yachts X-37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 Pearson 39 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1975 Pearson 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS