1997 Moody 38 vs Bavaria Cruiser 34 — Comparison

1997 Moody 38 1997 Moody 38
VS
Bavaria Cruiser 34 Bavaria Cruiser 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1997 Moody 38 Bavaria Cruiser 34
General
Manufacturer Moody Bavaria
Year 1997–2003 2010–2017
Type Sloop Sloop
Country UK Germany
Designer Bill Dixon Farr Yacht Design
Dimensions
LOA 11.58 m (38.0 ft) 10.25 m (33.6 ft)
LWL 9.60 m (31.5 ft) 9.15 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.72 m (12.2 ft) 3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.37 m (4.5 ft) 1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) 5,500 kg (12,125 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 59.8 m² (644 ft²) 50.0 m² (538 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Bilge Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity 227 L (60.0 gal) 180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Moody 38
14.98
Bavaria Cruiser 34
16.30
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Moody 38
38.89
Bavaria Cruiser 34
30.91
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Moody 38
0.74
Bavaria Cruiser 34
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Moody 38
20.98
Bavaria Cruiser 34
18.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Moody 38 and Bavaria Cruiser 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Moody 38 is a 1990s design by Moody from UK, while the Bavaria Cruiser 34 is a modern offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 1997 Moody 38 was penned by Bill Dixon. The Bavaria Cruiser 34 was designed by Farr Yacht Design.

In terms of size, the 1997 Moody 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the Bavaria Cruiser 34 at 10.25m (33.6ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 1997 Moody 38 is 1.33m longer than the Bavaria Cruiser 34. The 1997 Moody 38 displaces approximately 48% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Moody 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.98 and 59.8 m² of sail area. The Bavaria Cruiser 34, with an SA/D of 16.30 and 50.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Bavaria Cruiser 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Moody 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Bavaria Cruiser 34 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the 1997 Moody 38 and 30.9% for the Bavaria Cruiser 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Moody 38 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Bavaria Cruiser 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Moody 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria Cruiser 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1997 Moody 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS