1997 Nautor Swan 40 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1997 Nautor Swan 40
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1997 Nautor Swan 401982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanWesterly
Year1997–20021982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandUK
DesignerGerman FrersEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA12.30 m (40.4 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.85 m (12.6 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft2.20 m (7.2 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,600 kg (7,937 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.5 m² (791 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
17.93
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
42.35
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
0.76
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1997 Nautor Swan 40
18.11
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is a 1990s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 was penned by German Frers. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.85m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 is 2.80m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 displaces approximately 87% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.93 and 73.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1997 Nautor Swan 40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 150L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1997 Nautor Swan 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1997 Nautor Swan 40 · 1982 Westerly Konsort