1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC1984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerBeneteauPearson
Year1998–20031984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerGroupe FinotWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,100 kg (15,653 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area59.0 m² (635 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
16.23
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
35.21
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
0.76
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC
19.82
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC is 0.61m longer than the 1984 Pearson 34. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC displaces approximately 30% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.23 and 59.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 35.2% for the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Pearson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Beneteau Oceanis 36 CC · 1984 Pearson 34