Catalina 28 vs Hunter 36 — Comparison
Catalina 28
Hunter 36
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Catalina 28 | Hunter 36 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Hunter |
| Year | 1998–2004 | 1996–2001 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.69 m (28.5 ft) | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) |
| LWL | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| Beam | 2.90 m (9.5 ft) | 3.56 m (11.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,812 kg (6,199 lbs) | 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,134 kg (2,500 lbs) | 2,313 kg (5,099 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 33.5 m² (361 ft²) | 56.0 m² (603 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 27 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 95 L (25.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 95 L (25.1 gal) | 170 L (44.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Catalina 28 and Hunter 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 28 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 36 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The Catalina 28 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 36 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the Catalina 28 measures 8.69m (28.5ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the Hunter 36 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.56m beam. The Hunter 36 is 2.13m longer than the Catalina 28. The Hunter 36 displaces approximately 110% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Catalina 28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 36, with an SA/D of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Catalina 28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The Hunter 36 has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 40.3% for the Catalina 28 and 39.2% for the Hunter 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Catalina 28 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hunter 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Catalina 28 · Hunter 36