Catalina 28 vs Hunter 260 — Comparison
Catalina 28
Hunter 260
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Catalina 28 | Hunter 260 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Hunter |
| Year | 1998–2004 | 1998–2004 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.69 m (28.5 ft) | 7.85 m (25.8 ft) |
| LWL | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 6.86 m (22.5 ft) |
| Beam | 2.90 m (9.5 ft) | 2.74 m (9.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,812 kg (6,199 lbs) | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,134 kg (2,500 lbs) | 771 kg (1,700 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 33.5 m² (361 ft²) | 27.5 m² (296 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 10 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 38 L (10.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 95 L (25.1 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 1 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Catalina 28 and Hunter 260 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 28 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 260 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The Catalina 28 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 260 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the Catalina 28 measures 8.69m (28.5ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the Hunter 260 at 7.85m (25.8ft) with a 2.74m beam. The Catalina 28 is 0.84m longer than the Hunter 260. The Catalina 28 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Catalina 28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 260, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 260 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Catalina 28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The Hunter 260 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.87. The ballast ratios are 40.3% for the Catalina 28 and 37.8% for the Hunter 260, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Catalina 28 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 260 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Catalina 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 260 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Catalina 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Catalina 28 · Hunter 260