Hunter 260 vs 1974 Morgan 33 — Comparison

Hunter 260Hunter 260
VS
1974 Morgan 331974 Morgan 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 2601974 Morgan 33
General
ManufacturerHunterMorgan
Year1998–20041974–1980
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonCharlie Morgan
Dimensions
LOA7.85 m (25.8 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL6.86 m (22.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.74 m (9.0 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast771 kg (1,700 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area27.5 m² (296 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 260
17.37
1974 Morgan 33
14.19
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 260
37.78
1974 Morgan 33
39.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 260
0.87
1974 Morgan 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 260
15.99
1974 Morgan 33
22.09

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 260 and 1974 Morgan 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 260 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1974 Morgan 33 is a 1970s offering from Morgan from USA. The Hunter 260 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1974 Morgan 33 was designed by Charlie Morgan.

In terms of size, the Hunter 260 measures 7.85m (25.8ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1974 Morgan 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1974 Morgan 33 is 2.21m longer than the Hunter 260. The 1974 Morgan 33 displaces approximately 156% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 260 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 27.5 m² of sail area. The 1974 Morgan 33, with an SA/D of 14.19 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 260 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 260 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.87). The 1974 Morgan 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 37.8% for the Hunter 260 and 39.1% for the 1974 Morgan 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 260 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1974 Morgan 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 Morgan 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 260 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1974 Morgan 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 260 · 1974 Morgan 33