2010 Elan 340 vs 1974 Morgan 33 — Comparison

2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340
VS
1974 Morgan 331974 Morgan 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 Elan 3401974 Morgan 33
General
ManufacturerElanMorgan
Year2010–20141974–1980
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySloveniaUSA
DesignerRob HumphreysCharlie Morgan
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL9.00 m (29.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.0 m² (592 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Elan 340
17.31
1974 Morgan 33
14.19
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Elan 340
30.17
1974 Morgan 33
39.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Elan 340
0.76
1974 Morgan 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Elan 340
19.73
1974 Morgan 33
22.09

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Elan 340 and 1974 Morgan 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Elan 340 is a modern design by Elan from Slovenia, while the 1974 Morgan 33 is a 1970s offering from Morgan from USA. The 2010 Elan 340 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 1974 Morgan 33 was designed by Charlie Morgan.

In terms of size, the 2010 Elan 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1974 Morgan 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 2010 Elan 340 is 0.30m longer than the 1974 Morgan 33. The 2010 Elan 340 displaces approximately 11% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Elan 340 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1974 Morgan 33, with an SA/D of 14.19 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Elan 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1974 Morgan 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340 and 39.1% for the 1974 Morgan 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Elan 340 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1974 Morgan 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 Morgan 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 Elan 340 · 1974 Morgan 33