Hunter 280 vs 1983 Tartan 37 — Comparison

Hunter 280Hunter 280
VS
1983 Tartan 371983 Tartan 37

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 2801983 Tartan 37
General
ManufacturerHunterTartan
Year1998–20031983–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonSparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam2.82 m (9.3 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)
Ballast998 kg (2,200 lbs)3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area34.0 m² (366 ft²)57.0 m² (614 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 280
18.35
1983 Tartan 37
15.45
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 280
38.61
1983 Tartan 37
42.49
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 280
0.82
1983 Tartan 37
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 280
16.46
1983 Tartan 37
21.48

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 280 and 1983 Tartan 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 280 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1983 Tartan 37 is a 1980s offering from Tartan from USA. The Hunter 280 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1983 Tartan 37 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the Hunter 280 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.82m, compared to the 1983 Tartan 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1983 Tartan 37 is 2.75m longer than the Hunter 280. The 1983 Tartan 37 displaces approximately 181% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 280 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Tartan 37, with an SA/D of 15.45 and 57.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 280 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1983 Tartan 37 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the Hunter 280 and 42.5% for the 1983 Tartan 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 280 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1983 Tartan 37 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Tartan 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Tartan 37 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 280 · 1983 Tartan 37