Hunter 36 vs 1983 Tartan 37 — Comparison

Hunter 36Hunter 36
VS
1983 Tartan 371983 Tartan 37

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 361983 Tartan 37
General
ManufacturerHunterTartan
Year1996–20011983–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonSparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.56 m (11.7 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)
Ballast2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area56.0 m² (603 ft²)57.0 m² (614 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine27 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 36
17.43
1983 Tartan 37
15.45
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 36
39.22
1983 Tartan 37
42.49
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 36
0.79
1983 Tartan 37
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 36
17.17
1983 Tartan 37
21.48

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 36 and 1983 Tartan 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 36 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1983 Tartan 37 is a 1980s offering from Tartan from USA. The Hunter 36 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1983 Tartan 37 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the Hunter 36 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 1983 Tartan 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1983 Tartan 37 is 0.46m longer than the Hunter 36. The 1983 Tartan 37 displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 36 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Tartan 37, with an SA/D of 15.45 and 57.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1983 Tartan 37 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Hunter 36 and 42.5% for the 1983 Tartan 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1983 Tartan 37 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Tartan 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Tartan 37 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 36 · 1983 Tartan 37