2005 Sabre 426 vs Hunter 36 — Comparison

2005 Sabre 4262005 Sabre 426
VS
Hunter 36Hunter 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2005 Sabre 426Hunter 36
General
ManufacturerSabreHunter
Year2005–20121996–2001
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerJim TaylorGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA12.95 m (42.5 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL10.67 m (35.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,979 kg (22,000 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area77.5 m² (834 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP27 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Sabre 426
16.99
Hunter 36
17.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Sabre 426
38.64
Hunter 36
39.22
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Sabre 426
0.74
Hunter 36
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Sabre 426
19.02
Hunter 36
17.17

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Sabre 426 and Hunter 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Sabre 426 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the Hunter 36 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2005 Sabre 426 was penned by Jim Taylor. The Hunter 36 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2005 Sabre 426 measures 12.95m (42.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the Hunter 36 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2005 Sabre 426 is 2.13m longer than the Hunter 36. The 2005 Sabre 426 displaces approximately 69% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Sabre 426 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.99 and 77.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 36, with an SA/D of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Sabre 426 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Hunter 36 has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the 2005 Sabre 426 and 39.2% for the Hunter 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Sabre 426 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The Hunter 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2005 Sabre 426 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2005 Sabre 426 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2005 Sabre 426 · Hunter 36