1998 Hunter 340 vs 1979 O'Day 28 — Comparison

1998 Hunter 340 1998 Hunter 340
VS
1979 O'Day 28 1979 O'Day 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1998 Hunter 340 1979 O'Day 28
General
Manufacturer Hunter O'Day
Year 1998–2003 1979–1985
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Glenn Henderson C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL 9.02 m (29.6 ft) 7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Ballast 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) 1,089 kg (2,401 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 51.1 m² (550 ft²) 31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 95 L (25.1 gal) 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 152 L (40.2 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Hunter 340
16.78
1979 O'Day 28
16.16
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Hunter 340
37.50
1979 O'Day 28
40.01
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Hunter 340
0.80
1979 O'Day 28
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Hunter 340
17.69
1979 O'Day 28
18.69

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Hunter 340 and 1979 O'Day 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Hunter 340 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1979 O'Day 28 is a 1970s offering from O'Day from USA. The 1998 Hunter 340 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1979 O'Day 28 was designed by C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1998 Hunter 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1979 O'Day 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1998 Hunter 340 is 1.83m longer than the 1979 O'Day 28. The 1998 Hunter 340 displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Hunter 340 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 1979 O'Day 28, with an SA/D of 16.16 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Hunter 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Hunter 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1979 O'Day 28 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1998 Hunter 340 and 40.0% for the 1979 O'Day 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Hunter 340 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1979 O'Day 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 O'Day 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Hunter 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Hunter 340 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS