1998 Hunter 340 vs 2013 Dehler 41 — Comparison

1998 Hunter 340 1998 Hunter 340
VS
2013 Dehler 41 2013 Dehler 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1998 Hunter 340 2013 Dehler 41
General
Manufacturer Hunter Dehler
Year 1998–2003 2013–2019
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Glenn Henderson Judel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 12.35 m (40.5 ft)
LWL 9.02 m (29.6 ft) 11.00 m (36.1 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 3.80 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) 2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 51.1 m² (550 ft²) 74.0 m² (797 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 30 HP
Fuel Capacity 95 L (25.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 152 L (40.2 gal) 170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Hunter 340
16.78
2013 Dehler 41
19.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Hunter 340
37.50
2013 Dehler 41
33.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Hunter 340
0.80
2013 Dehler 41
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Hunter 340
17.69
2013 Dehler 41
15.56

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Hunter 340 and 2013 Dehler 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Hunter 340 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2013 Dehler 41 is a modern offering from Dehler from Germany. The 1998 Hunter 340 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2013 Dehler 41 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1998 Hunter 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2013 Dehler 41 at 12.35m (40.5ft) with a 3.80m beam. The 2013 Dehler 41 is 1.99m longer than the 1998 Hunter 340. The 2013 Dehler 41 displaces approximately 43% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Hunter 340 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 2013 Dehler 41, with an SA/D of 19.11 and 74.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Dehler 41 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Hunter 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2013 Dehler 41 has a comfort ratio of 15.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1998 Hunter 340 and 33.3% for the 2013 Dehler 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Hunter 340 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 2013 Dehler 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Hunter 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Dehler 41 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS