1998 Hunter 340 vs 1986 Westerly Oceanlord — Comparison

1998 Hunter 3401998 Hunter 340
VS
1986 Westerly Oceanlord

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Hunter 3401986 Westerly Oceanlord
General
ManufacturerHunterWesterly
Year1998–20031986–1992
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGlenn HendersonEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)12.04 m (39.5 ft)
LWL9.02 m (29.6 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.81 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)9,980 kg (22,002 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP50 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)182 L (48.1 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Hunter 340
16.78
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Hunter 340
37.50
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
36.36
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Hunter 340
0.80
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Hunter 340
17.69
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
23.70

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Hunter 340 and 1986 Westerly Oceanlord represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Hunter 340 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1998 Hunter 340 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1998 Hunter 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord at 12.04m (39.5ft) with a 3.81m beam. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord is 1.68m longer than the 1998 Hunter 340. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord displaces approximately 83% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Hunter 340 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1998 Hunter 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Hunter 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1998 Hunter 340 and 36.4% for the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Hunter 340 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 340L water and 182L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Hunter 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Hunter 340 · 1986 Westerly Oceanlord