1998 Hunter 340 vs 1990 Sabre 36 — Comparison
1998 Hunter 340
1990 Sabre 36
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1998 Hunter 340 | 1990 Sabre 36 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Sabre |
| Year | 1998–2003 | 1990–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Roger Hewson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.02 m (29.6 ft) | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.51 m (11.5 ft) | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.60 m (5.2 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) | 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) | 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 51.1 m² (550 ft²) | 52.5 m² (565 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 22 HP | 28 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 95 L (25.1 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 152 L (40.2 gal) | 151 L (39.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1998 Hunter 340 and 1990 Sabre 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Hunter 340 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1998 Hunter 340 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1990 Sabre 36 was designed by Roger Hewson.
In terms of size, the 1998 Hunter 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1990 Sabre 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1990 Sabre 36 is 0.61m longer than the 1998 Hunter 340. The 1990 Sabre 36 displaces approximately 8% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1998 Hunter 340 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 1990 Sabre 36, with an SA/D of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Hunter 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1998 Hunter 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1990 Sabre 36 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1998 Hunter 340 and 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1998 Hunter 340 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1990 Sabre 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1990 Sabre 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1998 Hunter 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1998 Hunter 340 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1998 Hunter 340 · 1990 Sabre 36