1998 Hunter 340 vs Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 — Comparison

1998 Hunter 3401998 Hunter 340
VS
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 Hunter 340Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
General
ManufacturerHunterJeanneau
Year1998–20032019
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerGlenn HendersonMarc Lombard
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)11.75 m (38.5 ft)
LWL9.02 m (29.6 ft)10.40 m (34.1 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.76 m (12.3 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)7,600 kg (16,755 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,300 kg (5,071 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)64.0 m² (689 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP29 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)280 L (74.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 Hunter 340
16.78
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
16.82
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 Hunter 340
37.50
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
30.26
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 Hunter 340
0.80
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 Hunter 340
17.69
Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389
17.14

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 Hunter 340 and Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 Hunter 340 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 is a modern offering from Jeanneau from France. The 1998 Hunter 340 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 was designed by Marc Lombard.

In terms of size, the 1998 Hunter 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 at 11.75m (38.5ft) with a 3.76m beam. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 is 1.39m longer than the 1998 Hunter 340. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 displaces approximately 40% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 Hunter 340 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389, with an SA/D of 16.82 and 64.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 Hunter 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1998 Hunter 340 and 30.3% for the Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 Hunter 340 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 280L water and 160L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Hunter 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Hunter 340 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 Hunter 340 · Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 389