1998 X-Yachts 332 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison

1998 X-Yachts 332
VS
1975 Pearson 281975 Pearson 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 X-Yachts 3321975 Pearson 28
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsPearson
Year1998–20031975–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL8.69 m (28.5 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Ballast1,900 kg (4,189 lbs)1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.5 m² (544 ft²)30.0 m² (323 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 X-Yachts 332
18.29
1975 Pearson 28
14.83
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 X-Yachts 332
40.43
1975 Pearson 28
43.08
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 X-Yachts 332
0.75
1975 Pearson 28
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 X-Yachts 332
19.07
1975 Pearson 28
21.23

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 X-Yachts 332 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is a 1990s design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is 1.53m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 displaces approximately 59% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.29 and 50.5 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1998 X-Yachts 332 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 X-Yachts 332 · 1975 Pearson 28