1998 X-Yachts 332 vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

1998 X-Yachts 332
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 X-Yachts 3321984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsPearson
Year1998–20031984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL8.69 m (28.5 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast1,900 kg (4,189 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.5 m² (544 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 X-Yachts 332
18.29
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 X-Yachts 332
40.43
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 X-Yachts 332
0.75
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 X-Yachts 332
19.07
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 X-Yachts 332 and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is a 1990s design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1984 Pearson 34 is 0.30m longer than the 1998 X-Yachts 332. The 1984 Pearson 34 displaces approximately 16% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.29 and 50.5 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1998 X-Yachts 332 and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Pearson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 X-Yachts 332 · 1984 Pearson 34