1998 X-Yachts 332 vs 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 — Comparison

1998 X-Yachts 332
VS
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1998 X-Yachts 3321994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsHallberg-Rassy
Year1998–20031994–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkSweden
DesignerNiels JeppesenOlle Enderlein
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)8.85 m (29.0 ft)
LWL8.69 m (28.5 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.02 m (9.9 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)
Ballast1,900 kg (4,189 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.5 m² (544 ft²)38.0 m² (409 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1998 X-Yachts 332
18.29
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
16.14
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1998 X-Yachts 332
40.43
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
40.54
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1998 X-Yachts 332
0.75
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1998 X-Yachts 332
19.07
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
20.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1998 X-Yachts 332 and 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is a 1990s design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was designed by Olle Enderlein.

In terms of size, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 at 8.85m (29.0ft) with a 3.02m beam. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is 1.21m longer than the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.29 and 50.5 m² of sail area. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29, with an SA/D of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1998 X-Yachts 332 and 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1998 X-Yachts 332 · 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29