Catalina 36 MkII vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison

Catalina 36 MkII Catalina 36 MkII
VS
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Catalina 36 MkII 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
General
Manufacturer Catalina Pacific Seacraft
Year 1999–2006 1982–2005
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Gerry Douglas William Crealock
Dimensions
LOA 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL 9.60 m (31.5 ft) 6.55 m (21.5 ft)
Beam 3.55 m (11.6 ft) 2.64 m (8.7 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,577 kg (14,500 lbs) 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 56.5 m² (608 ft²) 30.5 m² (328 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 27 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 95 L (25.1 gal) 45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 4
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 36 MkII
16.35
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
14.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 36 MkII
37.94
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 36 MkII
0.76
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 36 MkII
18.65
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
26.91

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 36 MkII and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 36 MkII is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The Catalina 36 MkII was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the Catalina 36 MkII measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The Catalina 36 MkII is 2.74m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The Catalina 36 MkII displaces approximately 107% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 36 MkII has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 56.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 36 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 36 MkII offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 37.9% for the Catalina 36 MkII and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 36 MkII provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 36 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 36 MkII offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS