Catalina 36 MkII vs 1998 Feeling 44 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Catalina 36 MkII | 1998 Feeling 44 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Feeling |
| Year | 1999–2006 | 1998–2005 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | France |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) | 13.41 m (44.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.60 m (31.5 ft) | 11.50 m (37.7 ft) |
| Beam | 3.55 m (11.6 ft) | 4.10 m (13.5 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.90 m (6.2 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 6,577 kg (14,500 lbs) | 10,500 kg (23,149 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) | 4,000 kg (8,818 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 56.5 m² (608 ft²) | 82.0 m² (883 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 27 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 95 L (25.1 gal) | 200 L (52.8 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 189 L (49.9 gal) | 400 L (105.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 8 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Catalina 36 MkII and 1998 Feeling 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 36 MkII is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Catalina 36 MkII was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1998 Feeling 44 was designed by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios.
In terms of size, the Catalina 36 MkII measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 1998 Feeling 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.10m beam. The 1998 Feeling 44 is 2.44m longer than the Catalina 36 MkII. The 1998 Feeling 44 displaces approximately 60% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Catalina 36 MkII has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 56.5 m² of sail area. The 1998 Feeling 44, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1998 Feeling 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Catalina 36 MkII offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1998 Feeling 44 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 37.9% for the Catalina 36 MkII and 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Catalina 36 MkII provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1998 Feeling 44 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Catalina 36 MkII is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1998 Feeling 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1998 Feeling 44 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Catalina 36 MkII · 1998 Feeling 44