1999 Catalina 400 vs 1984 Ericson 38 — Comparison

1999 Catalina 4001999 Catalina 400
VS
1984 Ericson 381984 Ericson 38

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1999 Catalina 4001984 Ericson 38
General
ManufacturerCatalinaEricson
Year1999–20061984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasBruce King / Ron Holland
Dimensions
LOA12.12 m (39.8 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,845 kg (19,500 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.9 m² (720 ft²)60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1999 Catalina 400
15.89
1984 Ericson 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1999 Catalina 400
41.03
1984 Ericson 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1999 Catalina 400
0.75
1984 Ericson 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1999 Catalina 400
18.97
1984 Ericson 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The 1999 Catalina 400 and 1984 Ericson 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1999 Catalina 400 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1984 Ericson 38 is a 1980s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1999 Catalina 400 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1984 Ericson 38 was designed by Bruce King / Ron Holland.

In terms of size, the 1999 Catalina 400 measures 12.12m (39.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 1984 Ericson 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1999 Catalina 400 is 0.54m longer than the 1984 Ericson 38. The 1999 Catalina 400 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1999 Catalina 400 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.89 and 66.9 m² of sail area. The 1984 Ericson 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 Ericson 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1999 Catalina 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 Ericson 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.0% for the 1999 Catalina 400 and 42.4% for the 1984 Ericson 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1999 Catalina 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1984 Ericson 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Ericson 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Ericson 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1999 Catalina 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1999 Catalina 400 · 1984 Ericson 38