1999 Catalina 400 vs Catalina 36 MkII — Comparison

1999 Catalina 4001999 Catalina 400
VS
Catalina 36 MkII

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1999 Catalina 400Catalina 36 MkII
General
ManufacturerCatalinaCatalina
Year1999–20061999–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA12.12 m (39.8 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,845 kg (19,500 lbs)6,577 kg (14,500 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.9 m² (720 ft²)56.5 m² (608 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP27 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1999 Catalina 400
15.89
Catalina 36 MkII
16.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1999 Catalina 400
41.03
Catalina 36 MkII
37.94
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1999 Catalina 400
0.75
Catalina 36 MkII
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1999 Catalina 400
18.97
Catalina 36 MkII
18.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1999 Catalina 400 and Catalina 36 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1999 Catalina 400 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the Catalina 36 MkII is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1999 Catalina 400 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Catalina 36 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1999 Catalina 400 measures 12.12m (39.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the Catalina 36 MkII at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1999 Catalina 400 is 1.15m longer than the Catalina 36 MkII. The 1999 Catalina 400 displaces approximately 34% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1999 Catalina 400 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.89 and 66.9 m² of sail area. The Catalina 36 MkII, with an SA/D of 16.35 and 56.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 36 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1999 Catalina 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Catalina 36 MkII has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.0% for the 1999 Catalina 400 and 37.9% for the Catalina 36 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1999 Catalina 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Catalina 36 MkII offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1999 Catalina 400 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 36 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1999 Catalina 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1999 Catalina 400 · Catalina 36 MkII