1999 Catalina 400 vs 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 — Comparison

1999 Catalina 4001999 Catalina 400
VS
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1999 Catalina 4002000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHallberg-Rassy
Year1999–20062000–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerGerry DouglasGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA12.12 m (39.8 ft)9.47 m (31.1 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)8.25 m (27.1 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.18 m (10.4 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,845 kg (19,500 lbs)4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.9 m² (720 ft²)44.5 m² (479 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths85
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1999 Catalina 400
15.89
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1999 Catalina 400
41.03
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1999 Catalina 400
0.75
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1999 Catalina 400
18.97
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1999 Catalina 400 and 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1999 Catalina 400 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1999 Catalina 400 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 1999 Catalina 400 measures 12.12m (39.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 at 9.47m (31.1ft) with a 3.18m beam. The 1999 Catalina 400 is 2.65m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 1999 Catalina 400 displaces approximately 92% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1999 Catalina 400 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.89 and 66.9 m² of sail area. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31, with an SA/D of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1999 Catalina 400 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has a comfort ratio of 20.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.0% for the 1999 Catalina 400 and 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1999 Catalina 400 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1999 Catalina 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1999 Catalina 400 · 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31