Hunter 306 vs 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 — Comparison

Hunter 306Hunter 306
VS
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 341997 Hallberg-Rassy 34

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 3061997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
General
ManufacturerHunterHallberg-Rassy
Year1999–20041997–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerGlenn HendersonGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA9.25 m (30.3 ft)10.35 m (34.0 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)8.85 m (29.0 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)3.34 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,990 kg (8,796 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area43.0 m² (463 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 306
17.37
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 306
39.80
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
41.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 306
0.78
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 306
19.11
1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34
20.67

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 306 and 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 306 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is a 1990s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The Hunter 306 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the Hunter 306 measures 9.25m (30.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 at 10.35m (34.0ft) with a 3.34m beam. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is 1.10m longer than the Hunter 306. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 displaces approximately 45% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 306 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 306 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 306 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 39.8% for the Hunter 306 and 41.4% for the 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 306 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 306 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 306 · 1997 Hallberg-Rassy 34