Hunter 306 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

Hunter 306Hunter 306
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 3062003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerHunterSabre
Year1999–20042003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA9.25 m (30.3 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,990 kg (8,796 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area43.0 m² (463 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 306
17.37
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 306
39.80
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 306
0.78
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 306
19.11
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 306 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 306 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Hunter 306 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the Hunter 306 measures 9.25m (30.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 2.94m longer than the Hunter 306. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 105% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 306 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 306 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 306 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 39.8% for the Hunter 306 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 306 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 306 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 306 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 306 · 2003 Sabre 402