2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 vs 1981 Nautor Swan 36 — Comparison

2000 Beneteau Oceanis 4112000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
VS
1981 Nautor Swan 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Beneteau Oceanis 4111981 Nautor Swan 36
General
ManufacturerBeneteauNautor Swan
Year2000–20051981–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceFinland
DesignerGroupe FinotSparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA12.22 m (40.1 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL10.52 m (34.5 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.90 m (12.8 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast2,800 kg (6,173 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area69.0 m² (743 ft²)54.5 m² (587 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
17.24
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
34.15
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
0.77
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411
16.90
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 1981 Nautor Swan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is a 2000s design by Beneteau from France, while the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 measures 12.22m (40.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 is 1.25m longer than the 1981 Nautor Swan 36. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.24 and 69.0 m² of sail area. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36, with an SA/D of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has a comfort ratio of 22.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 34.2% for the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 and 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Beneteau Oceanis 411 · 1981 Nautor Swan 36