2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Hallberg-Rassy 311976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyC&C Yachts
Year2000–20101976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenCanada
DesignerGerman FrersCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA9.47 m (31.1 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.25 m (27.1 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 0.59m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1976 C&C 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 · 1976 C&C 33