2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 1979 Pearson 37 — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
1979 Pearson 371979 Pearson 37

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Hallberg-Rassy 311979 Pearson 37
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyPearson
Year2000–20101979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA9.47 m (31.1 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL8.25 m (27.1 ft)8.69 m (28.5 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.43 m (11.3 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
1979 Pearson 37
15.18
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
1979 Pearson 37
42.49
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
1979 Pearson 37
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
1979 Pearson 37
24.10

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 1979 Pearson 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1979 Pearson 37 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 1979 Pearson 37 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 1979 Pearson 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.43m beam. The 1979 Pearson 37 is 1.81m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 1979 Pearson 37 displaces approximately 58% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1979 Pearson 37, with an SA/D of 15.18 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1979 Pearson 37 has a comfort ratio of 24.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 42.5% for the 1979 Pearson 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1979 Pearson 37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Pearson 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1979 Pearson 37 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 · 1979 Pearson 37